Less ballast, more compass
The Australian-Indonesian relationship is in the pits. That’s widely agreed. Now - where to from here?
Aside from
the moral need to live in peace with the neighbours, public servant Peter Varghese
has listed reasons for repair in a speech at the ANU marking the 50th
anniversary of the university’s Indonesia Project.
Unfortunately
the DFAT secretary offered few new tools or resources to do the job and sailed
past awkward facts. He wants business and citizens to supply ‘the
ballast it [the relationship] needs to cope with momentary political crises or
differences in policy.’
A favourite image among diplomats, ‘ballast’ is both inappropriate and
aged, dating back to 1988 according to Griffith University Professor Colin
Brown.
Ballast is inert – it has no value other than keeping a craft upright. It can’t determine direction. Sinking vessels ditch ballast first. ‘Compass’ provides a better metaphor.
Seeing the turbulence the relationship has encountered under DFAT’s captaincy
of ‘20 federal agencies cooperating with Indonesian counterparts in more than
60 discrete activities’ maybe it’s time to set a new course away from the
‘economic diplomacy’ followed so far.
One direction could be sport, an area where we excel and
Indonesians, for all their enthusiasm and ability, flounder. Another is entertainment. The Indonesian industry is huge, but quality
poor. With almost half the population under 25 we need to understand the value
of popular culture to connect – something not easily done by diplomats with
serious agendas and countenances to match.
Korean business is getting into the Archipelago led by its K-pop musicians
and film stars. Exchange programmes for
elite scholars are fine, but it’s the mood of the masyarakat, the masses,
that shape Indonesian politics.
Why do Australians rank Indonesia alongside Russia on Lowy
Institute’s ‘feelings thermometer’? Don’t blame the media for highlighting
incompetence and extremists, but successive governments that have failed to
help balance with well-funded Indonesian language and culture studies in
schools and universities.
This is a two way street; respect will return if and when President Joko (Jokowi) Widodo implements
his promises to make his nation a clean, modern and moderate state.
Varghese highlights Indonesia’s advances into democracy, more stable
than Thailand’s, more transparent than Malaysia’s and far livelier than
Singapore’s.
But it’s still a work in progress, fragile and threatened by oligarchs
more interested in power than policy.
Last year the parliament tried to kill direct local government
elections. US democracy advocate Freedom House has scored Indonesia as ‘partly
free’.
Another theme has Indonesia as a growing economic giant soon to dwarf
Australia. We’ve heard this wake-up
call before, but hard-nosed business people seeking stability and certainty
rank facts above rhetoric. Which is why
we do more business with tiny Singapore and distant New Zealand.
The World Bank definition of ‘middle class’ (what Varghese also
curiously calls ‘consumer class’ as though others don’t shop and eat) is a
household with an annual disposable income above US$3,000; the figure less
quoted by business boosters relates to those living below US $730 a year;
that’s the sum earned by about half the population of 250 million.
Economic progress is shackled by appalling transport systems, narrow
damaged roads and crowded hubs. The
World Economic Forum ranks Indonesia at 62 for the quality of its
infrastructure; Singapore is at 5 and Malaysia 25. Administration systems are decades behind international
standards. Inflation is well above seven per cent.
Corruption has been tackled piecemeal at the big end of town but continues
to strangle the Republic’s public service.
Fair application of the rule of law, essential for investors and locals
alike, remains elusive. Although Indonesia celebrates 70 years of independence
this month the legal system remains largely based on Dutch law.
A peaceful
and prosperous Indonesia is in everyone’s interests. These hazards illustrate the need to recognise the complexities
and get the relationship right. Neither
we nor they have been successful so far.
President Jokowi seems indifferent to his southern neighbour, while PM
Tony Abbott hasn’t endeared with megaphone diplomacy from afar.
Meanwhile
his British counterpart has been up close and personal. When David Cameron was
in Jakarta last month he huddled down in sealed rooms with men in suits to talk
trade.
Then he
entertained by taking a blusukan [street walkabout]. He shared a pisang goreng [fried
banana] plus a selfie with 20-year old popstar Maudy Ayunda (who’s also a
student at Oxford) and reaped positive publicity as a fun guy. Now that’s putting ballast into international
relations.
(First published in New Mandala 7 August 2015. For comment see:
http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2015/08/07/getting-up-close-and-personal-with-indonesia/
See also in The Age: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/getting-up-close-and-personal-with-indonesia-20150812-gixrpb.html
Also in The Canberra Times: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/getting-up-close-and-personal-with-indonesia-20150812-gixrpb.html
##
Also in The Canberra Times: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/comment/getting-up-close-and-personal-with-indonesia-20150812-gixrpb.html
##
No comments:
Post a Comment