FAITH IN INDONESIA

FAITH IN INDONESIA
The shape of the world a generation from now will be influenced far more by how we communicate the values of our society to others than by military or diplomatic superiority. William Fulbright, 1964
Showing posts with label PKI. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PKI. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 08, 2019

INDONESIA'S UNENDING SHAME


A JOURNEY TO THE DARK SIDE OF MARS     




                               
Mars Noersmono has a story he’s determined to tell. It’s deeply disturbing - a tale of horror and courage, despair and resilience. 
Although primarily about Indonesia’s bloody and brutal past, it’s also a sober warning against authoritarian governments everywhere that ignore the rule of law and create civilian panic against mythical monsters to justify violence and maintain power.
The illegality and human suffering is strong enough, but this is also a first-person account of a nation’s shame.
In September 1965 a coup was allegedly staged in Jakarta by the Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI), which was supporting founding President Soekarno.  Six generals and a lieutenant were murdered.
No uprising followed.  General Soeharto, who was to become the nation’s second president, took control with his authoritarian Orde Baru (New Order) administration.  This was to last 32 years.

The PKI was banned and in October 1965 the slaughter started – not of invading foreigners or armed revolutionaries – but unarmed ordinary citizens who had been peacefully (“though not uncritically,” said Noersmono) supporting their left-leaning president’s anti-colonial rhetoric. An estimated half-million died, their bodies thrown in rivers and mass graves.

The regime change was much welcomed by Western governments aware of the killings but failed to protest.  Official documents only recently released in the US and Australia showed diplomats were reporting events back to their bases in Washington, London and Canberra.

In 1965 the Cold War was at its height.  US and other troops, including Australians, were fighting a losing war in Vietnam to stop the southward spread of Communism; the abrupt and dramatic lurch to the right in Indonesian politics was seen as an end to the Red Tide.
In mid 1966 the Australian Prime Minister Harold Holt reportedly told the Australian-American Association in New York that ‘with 500,000 to one million Communist sympathisers knocked off, I think it is safe to assume a reorientation has taken place.’

The US Central Intelligence Agency was less callous. In 1968 a secret report claimed the killings ‘rank as one of the worst mass murders of the 20th century, along with the Soviet purges of the 1930s, the Nazi mass murders during the Second World War, and the Maoist bloodbath of the early 1950s.’

Thousands of others were arrested and jailed.  They were never charged or given the chance to plead in court. Nor were they told what crimes they’d allegedly committed. 

The brightest, perceived by Soeharto to be the most threatening, were not violent men but academics, teachers, writers and artists, the people essential to build a new society. They were exiled to remote Buru Island, 2,700 kilometers northeast of Jakarta. Among the 12,000 was Noersmono.

He’s now added his voice to the call for justice with Bertahan Hidup di Pulau Buru (A prisoner’s life on Buru Island), which he started after Soeharto fell late last century and Indonesia became democratic. 
Writing was the easy part.  Noersmono spent 15 years searching for a publisher prepared to face the wrath of the government and the many powerful forces determined to stop revelations of their involvement, or their relatives’ role in the massacres. These include the army, the police and religious organizations.
Only Bandung publisher Ultimus was prepared to take the risks – but few copies get onto mainstream bookshop shelves.
“I wrote the book because I want the younger generation to understand the truth, and pay respect to those who did not survive,” Noersmono said. “We are asking for recognition before we all die – is that too much?
“Writing has also lifted the burden I’ve been carrying for so long, and that’s a relief.  My dreams are now not so bad.”

Mars with children and grandchildren
For a moment the frail 79-year old broke down: “It’s only the second time I’ve cried – the first was in Yogyakarta (Central Java) when I was telling students my story.
“It has taken so long for me to get to this point because I’ve been afraid to be wrong.  The brutality of Buru destroyed our confidence.  We feared something bad would happen if we spoke out.  We were totally powerless.”
 Noersmono’s account is not a pity-me tract in a cheap printing, but a well-written and detailed 358-page history of the vile years, the torture, how the men lived, worked and found ways to adapt.
It includes pictures of the prisoners drawn by the author who among his many talents is also a fine draughtsman. Only a few blurred and grainy photos have survived; most prison buildings on the island have been torn down, so Noersmono’s sketches are invaluable.
Now back on Buru after spending the past few years with relatives in the East Java city of Malang, he has started sketching again in the hope that his pictures can be exhibited to keep the story alive.
Cemetery of those who died on Buru
Noersmono’s journey to jail started when he was 25, an undergraduate in his final year of engineering at Bandung’s prestigious Institute of Technology.  Before heading to the West Java capital he’d studied art in Jakarta and had taken units in architecture.
His father had been educated in a Dutch Catholic school and was the head of the nation’s Post and Telecommunications Service. Though staunch nationalists the family often spoke Dutch in their large Jakarta home.  They also owned a brickworks. 
Noersmono was the youngest of four and expected to manage the company after graduating. Next above was the only girl, then two boys. 
“It was a happy family,” Noersmono said. “We were always talking about politics.  During the campaign against the Dutch after Soekarno’s 1945 Proclamation of Independence my father sent secret coded messages to the revolutionaries fighting in Surabaya.”
Like students worldwide, Noersmono was involved in discussion groups.  The most popular was Consentrasi Gerakan Mahasiswa Indonesia (CGMI Indonesian Student Organization).  It held a congress in Jakarta in late September 1965.
Noersmono was attending just before the coup took place.  “It was a frightening and chaotic time,” he said.  “We didn’t know what was happening.”
But eldest brother Zochar, who worked as a translator on Chinese texts and was a leader in the CGMI, had a tip-off or premonition.   He fled to the Dutch Embassy with his young wife and was flown out of the country, first to China and then the Netherlands where he became a pharmacist.
On 17 October two members of the local militia came to the family house.  “We knew them, they were neighbors,” said Noersmono.  “They were reasonably polite and asked us to follow them to an office, but we heard of shootings so were getting nervous.
“A few days later my parents and I were arrested. The CGMI was banned.  My Dad was to spend 18 years in prison, my mother three.  My sister and brother fled Jakarta and weren’t caught.”

After spells in Jakarta jails, in 1970 Noersmono and 500 others were shipped to Buru on a five-day voyage.  They were never told where they were heading; by then they’d heard of the genocide, so were in great fear.

The government line has always been that the killings were spontaneous reactions by outraged pious peasants who hated the godless Marxists and could not be stopped.

This story has now been well buried by overseas academics like Australian Dr Jess Melvin – who state categorically that the slaughter was carefully organized by the army.
Her certainty is based on original documents she was given in Aceh - by the military. 

It has long been suspected that the papers exist, but the young doctoral student trounced all senior academics just by asking at an army office.  Her book about the find, The Army and the Indonesian Genocide, published last year, has rocked historians in Indonesia and overseas.

The genocide was engineered through a secret police unit with the Orwellian title Kopkamtib (Komando Operasi Pemulihan Keamanan dan Ketertiban - Operational Command for the Restoration of Security and Order.)

The men swinging the machetes and firing the rifles supplied by Kopkamtib weren’t all Muslims – Christians were also involved, particularly on Flores and islands further east. 

The killings are often described as ‘executions’, which sounds swift, legal even.  But many prisoners were viciously tortured, with women being mutilated and raped. How could such things happen in a culture of respect and conservative values?

Some participants look back with guilt and regret; others justify their actions by saying the times were so turbulent issues were black and white – for us or against us. Soeharto’s propaganda unit had created an environment dense with hate.  It coined the ominous term Gestapu for the coup and wrongly claimed the generals’ bodies had been mutilated.  .

Once on Buru the men, who had already been stripped of their civil rights, suffered further indignities. Noersmono’s shirt was stenciled number 493.  With a few basic tools they were ordered by armed guards to clear the forest and build their barracks.

Behind Mars is the site of his former house

 “For the first two months we had nowhere to live except the open air,” he said.  “We lived on rice porridge and whatever protein we could catch or gather.”
The prisoners were labeled tapol, an acronym for tahanan politik – political prisoner and held for up to 13 years.    
The tapol have never been compensated for wrongful imprisonment. Their plight has still to be officially recognised. Present President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo, who originally pledged to open discussions, visited Buru in 2015 but used the opportunity to urge farmers to improve  rice yields.  He said there’d be no inquiry.
Noersmono’s son Dwinura agreed – though with bitterness.  “This is not South Africa,” he said.  “There’s no Nelson Mandela driving the airing of history. 
“I’m proud of our father and we want his good name restored. He didn’t hurt anyone or steal anything – so what did he do to end in prison?  I want recognition of the wrongs done to so many who committed no crimes.  The army stole Dad’s land in Jakarta;  there’s been no compensation. There’ll be no reconciliation, no national apology as in other countries like Australia.  This is Indonesia.”
Dwinura and his two brothers were born on Buru in the 1980s after his father married the daughter of another tapol and stayed on the island after release.  About 200 others also remained.

“There was nothing left for us back in Java,” Noersmono said. “Our ID cards included the code ET identifying us as ex tapol.  This ensured we were shunned by employers, friends, and neighbors – and sometimes by relatives who feared guilt by association.”
The tapol were only partly free; they were kept under surveillance, had to report regularly to the police and were denied property rights and work in the public service.
Once the camps were closed the Orde Baru government started a transmigration program moving poor farming families from overcrowded Java to Buru where they were given land to grow crops.
The newcomers took over the jungle clearings opened up by the tapol, accessing their homes on roads cut into the interior by the former prisoners who received nothing.
Noersmono became a contractor using the skills he’d learned at university and built his own house.  He also designed and supervised the construction of a Rehoboth Presbyterian Church named after a pioneering chapel established in West Virginia (US) in 1786.
The Buru church was fire-bombed by Muslim mobs during the 1999 nation-wide ethnic and religious riots following the fall of Soeharto the previous year.  Funds have now been raised for its renovation which is already underway.
The prison camps were closed in 1980 after pressure from overseas governments hearing of the abuses.  Change was also hastened following the publishing of The Buru Quartet.
The novels, banned till recently in Indonesia, are by the late Pramoedya Ananta Toer who was held for 13 years on the island.  Although forbidden to write and denied pens and paper ‘Pram’ still managed to produce his fiction set in the Dutch East Indies at the start of the 20th century.   The books are about a young man named Minke and his growing awareness of colonization; nowhere is ‘Indonesia’ mentioned.
Pramoedya died in 2006 and is the only Indonesian writer ever nominated for a Nobel Prize.  He was sent to Buru for having ‘Marxist-Leninist thoughts’ and denied writing materials. 
 He composed and memorized his works and kept them fresh by reading aloud to fellow tapol at night. When he eventually got access to paper friends helped smuggle the manuscripts to Java where they were printed in clandestine workshops.

The Buru Quartet was also secretly translated into English by Australian diplomat Max Lane and became internationally famous. Pram kept writing once back in Java; his later books further exposed Indonesia’s dirty war against dissenters. 

Buru should be a journalist’s heaven. The isolated Indonesian island, 13 times larger than Singapore but with less than 200,000 residents, bristles with stories of tragedy and inspiration, saturated with politics.  The custodians of the tales are keen to speak, have their photos taken and give their real names.

“I’ll tell you what happened,” said Diro Oetomo. “I want the world to know.”  He also stayed on Buru, married and opened a shop.  The man would be a tobacco company’s pin-up boy, a heavy smoker all his life, but still fit at 83.

“We made cigarettes from papaya leaves and lit them by rubbing dry sticks together to make fire.  I’m whispering because walls have ears.  After you’ve gone someone will come round and ask what I’ve said.
“Did we ever hope for release?  Never.  All we thought about was when and how we would die.”
Hundreds perished of starvation or killed themselves, usually by hanging or drinking pesticides.  After a particularly brutal guard Pelda Panita Umar was murdered in 1972 by a tapol, 42 were killed in retaliation, said Noersmono.  There’s a memorial to Umar but no recognition of the tapol.
In the Savana Village cemetery are 150 graves. A few have headstones but most are unmarked mounds.  More than 300 names of the dead were collected by Pramoedya and published privately but many more remain unknown.
Despite almost two decades of democracy and the abandonment of oppressive rules governing the ET’s rights, intimidation persists. It’s no longer “the pointed finger as powerful as a pistol” as Oetomo said, but it’s still sinister and it starts at the island’s Namlea airport.

This is served by a 30-minute daily flight from the regional capital Ambon to the east and capital of the Maluku Province.  These islands, long plundered by the Dutch for cloves, sit just under the equator.

They have long and bloody histories going back centuries, but today are peaceful and part of the Republic.  This is not a special zone governed by regulations which don’t apply in the rest of the nation.

However the terminal has more than airline staff; it’s thick with police, soldiers and Intel (intelligence service) plain-clothes officers.  They ignore Asians but focus on white-skin arrivals, questioning motives, gathering documents, reporting back to their superiors and distressing the visitors’ local hosts in their private homes.

In this intimidating environment it takes courage to be seen with reporters.  The ETs no longer care but their families do. No parents want their children teased at school for having big black combat boots on the porch.  The Red Bogeyman still stalks the land.  During this year’s Presidential election campaign Widodo’s rivals suggested with no proof that his late father Widjiatno Notomiharjo had been a PKI member.
In Indonesia discussion groups about Buru and the genocide have been closed down by the police.  US-born British director Joshua Oppenheimer’s films about the genocide, The Act of Killing and The Look of Silence have been shown openly abroad and won awards.  In Indonesia they’ve only been screened covertly.
While Indonesian authorities try to keep Pandora’s box well locked, arguing that release will inflame community tensions, the story has already escaped, largely helped by activists. They took Indonesia to the International People's Tribunal at The Hague, which found Indonesia ‘responsible for, and guilty of, crimes against humanity’.
The verdict was flicked away by the government. Defense Minister Ryamizard Ryacudu reportedly responded: ‘Why listen to foreigners? Foreigners should listen to Indonesia’.  Which is what the Tribunal had been doing.
Locally Komnas HAM (Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia), the National Commission on Human Rights, doggedly persists in publishing reports and reminding politicians that the stain on the nation remains, but most scholarship comes from overseas.
Last year Canadian Geoffrey Robinson published a potent account of the time titled The Killing Season.  The Financial Times ranked it as ‘one of the best books of history in 2018.’

The author describes Buru as a ‘concentration camp’ and ‘penal colony’; The New York Times called it ‘Soeharto’s Gulag’. The government’s terms were  ‘resettlement project’ for ‘political rehabilitation.’ 

Robinson, now a professor at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles), was a student of the late Benedict Anderson and Ruth McVey at Cornell University.  They were the first to question the Indonesian army’s account of the coup and killings.

Their analysis, which came to be known as the Cornell Paper, was discredited by the Indonesian Government and its authors banned.  Which ensured their views got an even wider audience.

Robinson has maintained his mentors’ fire: ‘I am still sickened and outraged –all the more so because the crimes committed have been all but forgotten and those responsible have not yet been brought to justice.’


Attempts were made in 2015 (the 50th anniversary of the coup) by academics, journalists and the victims’ families to ventilate the history and begin a process of reconciliation.  That has largely not happened.

On the same year police threatened to close down the internationally-famous annual Ubud Writers’ and Readers’ Festival in Bali if it promoted books about the coup and genocide.  Participants were outraged, the foreign organizers modified their program to appease, but discussion continued.
“I still don’t know why I was arrested,’ Noersmono said. ‘You ask them.  Was I a Communist?  I don’t understand Communism – are you talking Russian, Chinese or Indonesian?”
Noersmono is a Protestant.  He says his faith helped him through the ordeals. Another factor may have been his lively mind observing and recording everything, and his curiosity in local technology, like crude stills to make eucalyptus oil.
“There was no support from Indonesian congregations,” he said.  “We were not executed because the churches overseas were concerned with the human rights abuses and broadcast our plight. Gradually curbs were relaxed.”  Eventually the men’s families were allowed onto the island.
Once free Noersmono married Nursilah, 59, whose father was a tapol  “If I hadn’t been sent to Buru I would not have met my beloved,” he said.
 “I’ve always tried to be cheerful and see the positive.  But I cannot forgive Soeharto - not just for what he did to us, but for the way he destroyed the spirit and character of our nation that had been built up by Soekarno.
“As historians say – if we don’t know our past we are doomed to repeat the mistakes. I have seven grandchildren. I never want this to ever happen again to them or my country –or the people of any other nation.”

##

Wednesday, February 27, 2019

JOBS FOR THE BOYS IN KHAKI

    Old soldiers don’t die – they just imagine                                    

Historians and older Westerners know well what followed the 1933 events in Germany known as ‘the burning of the books.’  Few Indonesians are aware that the forceful Student Union campaign against literature which didn’t promote the ‘German spirit’, fomented fascism.  

They should because it’s happening in their young democracy and threatening its future.

Right-wing elements of the Indonesian military are on a mission to recapture the political power lost early this century under the Reformasi movement.  

They’re using several tactics; the latest is to cleanse the nation of writings which soldiers deem to be promoting Communism or don’t conform to the official line of what happened on 30 September 1965.

That night six generals and a lieutenant were murdered in Jakarta, allegedly by members of the Communist Party (PKI).  A dreadful bloodletting followed with an estimated half million real or suspected party members slaughtered.

The upheaval felled founding President Soekarno and propelled General Soeharto into the Presidential Palace where he stayed for 32 years wielding absolute power by crushing all opposition. 

He also ruled through patronage, giving army cronies ambassadorships, company directorships, governorships and other perks. At one stage 75 seats of the Parliament’s then 360 were held by appointed members of the military.

The Dwifungsi (two functions) policy entrenched the armed forces’ role in society, even giving low-ranks the right to barge through queues and demand instant service.

Soeharto quit in 1998 after student protests against his rule and corruption.   Indonesia then went through its version of the Arab Spring, introducing democracy, direct election of the President, and freeing the press. 

The police became a separate civilian department charged with maintaining internal order. Previously it had been a branch of the army.  

There are now around 500,000 men and a few women in the armed forces, plus 400,000 reservists. The police also have about half-a million. Conscription is in the law but volunteers easily fill the ranks.

Before Reformasi the military saw itself as the exclusive custodian of the nation’s values, which it determined.  Remnants of that age refuse to accept the world has spun into a new orbit and their place is the barracks.  Key among them is the paranoid former Armed Forces Commander, General Gatot Nurmantyo.

He reckons Indonesia is threatened by ‘proxy wars’ involving foreign states, particularly the US and Australia.  In his nightmare the allies are planning to invade West Papua. He reasons that’s why marines are rotated through Darwin under the 2014 Force Posture Agreement.

Nurmantyo is also notorious for reportedly saying: ‘Our (Indonesia’s) democracy at the moment is populist and led by forces through means of a vote. The many are not necessarily right.’

In 2017 he suspended all military cooperation with Australia.  His action, which appears to have been unilateral, came after a hyper-nationalist officer training at the Australian Special Forces base in Perth claimed lecturers were insulting the Republic.  The scrub fire had to be hosed down at ministerial level.

Before Nurmantyo, 58, retired last year he was being tipped as a candidate for the presidency. That didn’t happen but he continues to get coverage with weird statements about conspiracies and returning Reds.  They’re not under beds (the masses use mattresses on the floor), so they’re plotting in unnamed restaurants and dark rooms.

He’s backing another former general, Prabowo Subianto who’s standing against incumbent Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo; the official commander-in-chief has no military background.
The book seizings appear to be illegal; in 2010 the Constitutional Court overthrew the censorship laws of Soeharto’s New Order government. 
The raids have only been condemned by civil rights groups and individuals brave enough to shrug off charges that they’re fellow travelers. Widodo, who has also joined the chorus of vigilantes, has been silent.
The print enemies sought by soldiers are few and hard to find.  Occasionally there’s a wrinkled translation of Karl Marx, plus some speculative tracts by pseudonymous scribes.  The most credible alternatives to the army’s version of history are coming from overseas scholars, written in English and rarely seen.
Last year Australian academic Dr Jess Melvin published her research founded on original army documents.  Not for her the excuse that the massacres were spontaneous uprisings of pious Muslims outraged by godless Marxists.

The conclusions in her book The Army and the Indonesian Genocide are definitive:
The military organised the mass killings and supplied the weapons.  Soldiers arrested suspects and then gave them to armed mobs to torture and murder. 

The devil makes work for idle hands; the army now has little to do other than chase armed separatists in West Papua and help out in natural disasters; these strike regularly and brutally through earthquakes, tsunamis, landslips and floods.  A few officers go overseas on peacekeeping, but the rest tend to be perpetually exercising – ready for the threats.

This month the respected newsweekly Tempo reported that the military wants changes to a 2004 law restricting retired officers to positions in a limited number of ministries and civil institutions.
Military chief Hadi Tjahjanto was reported saying about 500 middle and high-ranking officers heading for pensions wanted to get involved in civilian life.  A curious request in the West, though not in Indonesia where the much-medalled expect sinecures to preserve their prestige.

So what can old soldiers do to ease their post-power pains but hanker for the good ol’ days and dream up menace? Authors are an easy target, though ironically few Indonesians buy books.   This is hardly surprising as so many were banned during the Soeharto era.
##

 First published in Pearls and Irritations 27 February 2019. See: 
https://johnmenadue.com/duncan-graham-old-soldiers-dont-die-they-just-imagine/


Monday, October 29, 2018

DESROYING THE PKI REMNANTS - THE STORY UNCOVERED


The injustice which won’t die 


 




















President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo was just a four-year old when the 30 September coup led to the fall of founding president Soekarno and the rise of Major-General Soeharto as Indonesia’s second president.

The little lad was too busy playing kelereng (marbles) around his family’s shack on the Solo River banks in Central Java to understand the political games rocking the Republic in faraway Jakarta.

Even if some relatives had sniffed the reforms promised by the three-million strong Partai Komunis Indonesia (Indonesian Communist Party - PKI), infecting the real or imagined interests of any foreparents on their offspring is an obscenity.

That the slur gets some traction among Jokowi’s more gullible opponents shows how well Soeharto’s propaganda machine worked, embedding beyond two generations an unblinking hatred of a political ideology that currently runs the world’s most populous nation.

Here’s the irony: Red China is now Indonesia’s largest export and import market and a worrying naval force in surrounding seas.  Polls suggest most Indonesians think favorably of the country helping finance their nation’s massive infrastructure program.

Yet Soeharto linked China to the coup and severed diplomatic ties - only re-established in 1990.  Not normalized is a fearless examination of the coup and the appalling pogrom which followed.

Instead it’s been left to foreign journalists and academics to exhume the past for truths the government still finds too difficult to stomach.

Dr Vannessa Hearman is an historian at Australia’s Charles Darwin University but she’s no outsider. She was born in Indonesia and has become a leading expert on the horrors.  Her doctorate was jointly awarded best PhD in Asian Studies.  

Her latest book Unmarked Graves probes the post-coup killings in East Java.  At the time about 22 million people lived in the Province; an estimated 200,000 were slaughtered and thousands more persecuted long after the PKI had been destroyed.

Teachers were targeted with around 25,000 rounded-up, interrogated and often imprisoned.  Their careers were shredded and families shattered.

In one case encountered by Hearman a couple was being hounded four years after the coup.  They kept moving but were denounced and eventually jailed, split from their kids.  Their descendants have never fully recovered.

The fact that the author uses pseudonyms shows how the decades haven’t washed out the pain and stigma.

Along with the victims’ wrenching stories, Hearman focuses on a lesser-known event - the attempted PKI regroup in South Blitar, about 800 kilometers southeast of the capital.

PKI general secretary Sudisman was caught in 1966 and put on trial.  He denied Communists powered the putsch but was executed in 1998.  Party remnants fled Jakarta seeking a remote sanctuary.  

Many were city people who would find rural life hard to take, but even barefoot and hungry was better than bullets or bars. One pragmatic asylum-seeker, tainted because he’d studied engineering in Bulgaria, reasoned: ‘It’s better to resist than die for no reason.’ 

South Blitar is an arid tortured landscape of 3,200 square kilometers between the Brantas River and the Southern Ocean  It’s creased with mountains, perforated with limestone caves, a haven for guerrillas fighting the Dutch between 1945 and 1949.

Life was tough and basic. Chairs were rare, bicycles rarer. Poverty was too simplistic an explanation for peasants favoring Communist policies.  Other factors included land ownership and the santri (pious) - abangan (syncretism) religious divide.

Hearman’s research was difficult.  Apart from finding survivors prepared to recall, she was also questioned by the police when she visited the monument featured on the book cover.  

Details she uncovered are horrifying. The army had spread the myth that female Communists had hidden tattoos, which gave soldiers licence to strip suspects. The military used villagers as spies and ordered them to kill, creating lasting guilt and enmity.

The two-month Operasi Trisula (trident) to destroy the PKI refugees involved 5,000 soldiers and 3,000 militia.  It claimed to have caught or killed 2,000 but only found 34 old firearms and some blowpipes.

The tactics were much like the Vietnam War with people digging tunnels and the army bombing suspect hideouts and slaughtering innocents.  Other strategies included the ‘fence of legs’ to comb the forest, burn huts, rip up vegetables, deport villagers to other areas and use locals to bury murdered prisoners.

Victors carve history, but time and truth erode their graven images. The statue portrays the counter-insurgency as a triumphant campaign of cooperation between disciplined soldiers and willing civilians to defeat Communists.  Hearman’s scholarship reveals other effigies which many want to keep shrouded.. 

The innocent children and grandchildren of the tapol (political prisoners) are still looking sideways despite Jokowi’s 2014 election pledge to tackle human rights abuses.  

Hearman writes: ‘In 2016, the President appointed a former army general, Wiranto ... (to deal) with the 1965 case. 

Having been indicted by the UN in 2003 for crimes against humanity that took place in East Timor in 1999 during his reign as Indonesian armed forces commander, Wiranto is hardly a likely figure for pursuing perpetrators of human rights abuses. 

The Attorney General’s office has, at the time of writing, continued to refuse to open an investigation ... on the 1965–66 violence.

Hearman’s research bold-texts the most damning question: How can the searing evidence she’s captured be ignored unless some of the guilty still hold great power in today’s democratic Indonesia? 

Unmarked GravesDeath and Survival in the Anti-Communist Violence in East Java, Indonesia
Vannessa Hearman, NUS Press, Singapore, 2018
272 pages

 First published in The Jakarta Post 29October 2018