FAITH IN INDONESIA

FAITH IN INDONESIA
The shape of the world a generation from now will be influenced far more by how we communicate the values of our society to others than by military or diplomatic superiority. William Fulbright, 1964
Showing posts with label Battle of Surabaya. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Battle of Surabaya. Show all posts

Saturday, August 22, 2015

REVOLUTION IN THE CITY OF HEROES

Maju! The cry of the student soldiers 

              


Suhario [Kecik] Padmodiwiryo died in Jakarta last year on 19 August. 

He was 93 and a prominent hero of the 1945 Battle of Surabaya. Historian and journalist Dr Frank Palmos claims the former General was ‘the brightest literary star to emerge from Surabaya’. Yet Kecik’s passing was poorly recognised.

That defect is about to be repaired with the publication of his vivid memoir Revolution in the City of Heroes, translated into English by Palmos.

The battle in early November formed, fired and fixed the clay first shaped by president Soekarno’s declaration of independence on 17 August 1945.

Other cities, including Jakarta, had largely accepted the allies’ arrival to disarm the Japanese and repatriate the 70,000 European prisoners of war.

Though not in the East Java capital where thousands of young people [pemuda also known as Arek Suroboyo] rightly deduced that the British Indian army had another agenda – to reinstate the Dutch once the occupiers had gone.

The British little understood they were entering ‘the cauldron of the Surabayan revolution’.  They relied on the colonialists’ arrogant advice that Indonesians would joyfully welcome the return of their masters.

The Dutch refused to accept the world had changed forever after Japan had defeated the European colonialists. They loathed Soekarno and dismissed the proclamation. Grave errors.

Europeans who tried to retake their homes and businesses found the properties occupied by Indonesians who refused to budge.  Kecik reported what happened next:

‘Battered and bloodied bodies were spread around the inner city streets that had once been elegant shopping centers. This was a prelude to open warfare’.

The next movement came quickly. Dutch officers and administrators moved into Surabaya’s Hotel Oranje, now the Majapahit, the city’s most prestigious address.  They claimed local expertise but didn’t realize the ‘menial hotel staff and dining room waiters’ were dentistry students who understood Dutch.

The spies eavesdropped the braggarts and learned their plans to raise the tricolor of the Netherlands Kingdom above the hotel. So schoolboy Kusno shinned up the pole, and ripped off the lower blue stripe to create the flag of the Republic.  It was game on.

Kecik was a medical student given military training by the Japanese.  As deputy commander of a 500-strong force he helped retake the Hall of Justice headquarters of the Kempeitai, the hated secret police.  But his ‘troops’ were beyond control: 

‘They moved in a jumbled formation and all seemed in aggressive high spirits, which they enhanced by continuous slogan shouting: “Maju! Maju! Maju! Advance! Advance! Advance!”

‘Any formal effort to organise these boys into a more disciplined advance or to coordinate their firing would have failed. My military knowledge was useless here because all tactical principles had merged into one: Advance!’

The book has a curious genesis. In the 1960s Kecik, now a General, had been on a military course in Russia.  When he returned Soekarno had been deposed by Soeharto who was purging Communists and real or imagined fellow travelers.

Though he’d also been to the US for similar training Kecik was put under house arrest.  With no formal duties he compiled his memoirs drawing from ‘my lively imagination [which] had the dreaded habit of accurately foretelling the dark future of my lovely town.’ 

Comments Palmos: ‘For pure, unselfishly written diarizing, nothing in Indonesian literature compares. It has no peer in Indonesian literature as a step-by-step record of ground level activity in the fight for independence…at a time when the future of the proclaimed Republic looked bleak indeed.’

Palmos had been a foreign correspondent stationed in Jakarta towards the end of Soekarno’s rule.  Five years ago his research into the Battle of Surabaya was being hampered by a lack of first-person accounts. 

To his surprise he discovered Kecik was still alive and writing his four-volume text   Pemikiran Militer [Military Thinking].  

Armed with a video camera the Australian immediately flew from Perth to Bekasi.  The two men got on well and the old soldier agreed to work on a translation of the Surabaya section of his memoirs. 

The book’s credibility is enhanced by Kecik’s stern criticism of some pemuda for their sadism, and contempt for later accounts that glamorized his former comrades as gallants wearing headbands and striking ‘bold heroic poses’:

‘We were gathered on serious business, with fashion or posturing playing no part in this life or death contract we were entering into to win independence.’

This is not a monochrome memoir, brave Indonesians versus treacherous Westerners.  There are human moments - a Sikh soldier telling a boy whose gun misfired to go home, a Catholic and Muslim under fire praying together in high Javanese.

The English version includes information Palmos gleaned from other sources, including interviews with Roeslan Abdulgani, later to became foreign minister.

The slaughter – maybe close to 20,000 died - might have been lessened had the British conducted their own intelligence and known more of the Javanese culture of respect.

 According to Kecik truce negotiators ‘ [Captain Harold] Shaw and Abdulgani were civilized, educated and polite men who would in peace time have become friends, whereas [Shaw’s superiors] were unnaturally stiff in their approaches to our Governor, resorting to haughty postures.’

As the Revolutionaries set about arming themselves they confronted Japanese soldiers standing to attention at an armory.  From his earlier contact with the occupiers Kecik understood that they would not take the initiative and defend their weapons because they’d been trained only to follow orders.

Had they been told to remain passive, or were orders about to be given?  The young men grabbed the guns and retreated as their foes stared rigidly ahead.  But elsewhere there was serious fighting as the Japanese retaliated.

Australians in particular now have the chance to understand why their northern neighbors are such determined defenders of their revolution, and how the battle has defined the nation and underpinned the fortitude of its people.

Diplomats and public servants seeking a better relationship should read Revolution and reflect that neither Malaysia nor Singapore had to fight for their independence like the Indonesians.

Writes Palmos: ‘Kecik’s book corrects the common, mistaken assumption that
Indonesia was free from the day independence was proclaimed on 17 August 1945.’


Revolution in the City of Heroes                                                                            by Suhario ‘Kecik’ Padmodiwiryo, translated by Frank Palmos,
Published by Ridge Books, Singapore
206 pages

(First published in The Jakarta Post  16 August 2015)










Monday, May 25, 2015

FULFILLING THE SACRED TRUST

The story that wouldn’t stop gnawing     
                

Every great nation strives to know the truth of its foundation, why it exists and who was responsible.

When Dr Frank Palmos, whose words start this story, was in Jakarta more than a half century ago he was handed a sacred trust.
Neither he nor the donor realized it at the time for the young Australian was one more face in a sea of students at the since demolished Ikada Stadium. They were listening to diplomat and revolutionary leader Dr Roeslan Abdulgani speak on the Principles of the Indonesian Revolution. 
The stand-out was that Palmos wasn’t just the only foreigner in the audience - he’d plonked himself in the front-row.  Blessed with confidence, language skills and an inquiring mind the historian-to-be and the Foreign Minister that was, mixed and matched.
So when Palmos returned to the capital in 1964 with a degree in Indonesian Studies as correspondent for several newspapers the friendship thrived. “Dr Abdulgani was as exciting and funny as President Soekarno,” Palmos recalled.  “He was generous with his relationship.”
The freedom fighter was also a writer with a strong interest in history, particularly the birth of the nation in 1945 where he’d been a midwife.  His book One Hundred Days in Surabaya that Shook Indonesia was translated by Palmos into English. 
Till now historians have reckoned it’s one of the few authoritative texts about youngsters armed with bamboo spears who turned words into action after Soekarno proclaimed Independence on 17 August.
Six weeks later a British-led force of tough Indian troops landed to recover the East Java capital for the return of the colonialists.
But the Surabayans defied the battle-hardened Gurkhas, killed their commander Brigadier Aubertin Mallaby, and fought furiously against the misinformed invaders, for the Dutch had arrogantly assumed they’d be welcome back.
The fighting climaxed on 10 November, now recognized as National Heroes’ Day.
Although the British eventually secured the city and its port the revolutionaries’ furious resistance inspired the nascent nation to maintain the struggle for four more years till the Dutch capitulated in 1949.
The story of those tragic times is now to be retold.   Tanah Keramat [Sacred Territory] should be available in Indonesian in time for the 70th anniversary of the day that determined the Republic would be free.
Palmos developed the book out of his doctoral thesis at the University of Western Australia.  Inevitably he’s encountered some resentment: What’s a foreigner doing with such precious national memories?  Recounting any state’s history is a job for the home-grown.
“I have a ready reply,” said Palmos during a visit to East Java where he’s been supervising the translation and talking to a publisher. The initial print run could be 5,000 copies – a big order in a culture where readers browse but seldom buy.
“I could not have written this without access to the personal papers of Dr Abdulgani, one of the Republic’s founders.  These were given to me by his family when he died in 2005.
“Before everything went to the National Archives I worked through the collection.  It included documents the 1945 History Committee had assembled to publish a major book.
“However Soekarno was against the project; he didn’t wish to focus praise or attention on any one ethnic group, or city or incident.
“After Soekarno was deposed by Soeharto, Dr Abdulgani became Ambassador to the United Nations. [The headquarters are in New York.] While in the US he was influenced by the way Americans handled their history and kept it alive.
“Later in the 1990s he was an advisor to Megawati Soekarnoputri [daughter of Soekarno and later the nation’s fifth President] when she was opposing the Soeharto government. So he was never able to write the book.
 “Another major resource was General Purnawarman Suhario’s Memories of a Student Soldier. I encountered this by chance and learned the author was still alive.
“I borrowed a video recorder and rushed to Jakarta.  The old soldier, known as Hario Kecik, came to the Obor Foundation publisher’s office in his uniform and medals – it was an extraordinary and moving moment. I also had access to interviews conducted with veterans by the army.  My book is really fulfilling and extending Dr Abdulgani’s dream.”

 [In 2003 Dr Retnowati Abdulgani-Knapp [ right, with Frank] published a biography of her father titled A Fading Dream.]
After Jakarta Palmos was sent to report on the Vietnam War.  In Saigon he survived an ambush that killed four other journalists.  He spent two years in the US where he covered space missions. Later he worked in Australian television.  “But the Battle of Surabaya continued to gnaw,” he said. “It was unfinished business.”

Palmos’ trip to Surabaya was funded by the Australia-Indonesia Association.  Last year he won the AIA’s media section award given ‘to recognise and honor Australians who have made significant contributions to the greater understanding and friendship between Indonesians and Australians’.

 

On the award night he told the audience:  “I’d like to leave this earth knowing I’d left behind a legacy of literature and history.”

 

On a side trip to Malang this month (April) Palmos, 75, told The Jakarta Post: “The Indonesian people treated me so wonderfully as a student. It would be wrong for me not to use the knowledge I’ve gained to repay the Republic for what it has given to me.
“I didn’t expect Indonesian historians to be so disinterested. But Soeharto had his version of the past written after the 1965 coup and I think many just gave up. They should now read and criticise and add to my book.
“Serious journalists are beholden  to continue writing and do more than just go home and talk about the old days.
“The people of Surabaya are the first independent citizens of Indonesia.  They saved the Republic, they defended the Proclamation.
“I hope Sacred Territory revives young people’s interest in their nation’s history.  The older generation has had its chance. Dr Abdulgani told me long ago that it was a good story; he was right.”
##

 (First published in The Jakarta Post 25 May 2015)


Sunday, December 18, 2011

ROESLAN ABDULGANI: 'Supersemar exists'


(Above: Dr Abdulgani's daughter, Retnawati Abdulgani-Knapp and fellow historian Dr Frank Palmos in November 2011)

SURVIVING THE KLEPTOCRAZIES:

First published in Inside Indonesia Edition 77 Jan-March 2004, but now curiously absent from the magazine’s archives. Republished here to make it more accessible following the publishing of Frank Palmos' thesis on the Battle of Surabaya (see stories below). Dr Abdulgani died in 2005.

Reflections from former Foreign Affairs Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, Dr. H. Roeslan Abdulgani.

Duncan Graham

Supersemar does exist. I have seen it. It is still in the hands of

Harto. [Suharto, Indonesia’s second president.] But it was

misinterpreted by him to remove Sukarno”.

Supersemar (Surat Perintah Sebelas Maret), or Letter of 11 March) was a

letter allegedly written by Sukarno requesting that Suharto impose order

following the 1965 coup. It was used as the legal authority transferring

power to Suharto — but a copy has never surfaced.

There are probably as many anecdotes about the mysterious document and

the events surrounding it as there are Indonesians. Very few who were

close to the action are still alive and remember with clarity their

experiences first hand.

The anecdote quoted above is by former Foreign Affairs Minister and

Deputy Prime Minister Dr Roeslan (also known as Ruslan) Abdulgani, whose revolutionary and

founding father credentials are stainless. They include a badly damaged

right hand, the result of being strafed in 1948 by a Dutch plane. At the

time he was riding a bike through Yogyakarta trying to save the young

republic’s critical documents. He was treated by a Dutch doctor, and

then imprisoned in hospital.

Now almost 90 and frail, he still has a sharp mind (“age is

opportunity”), a powerful command of English, and some certainties not

eroded by time. These include his belief that the American Central

Intelligence Agency was also involved in the 1965 coup in which six

Indonesian generals were killed, precipitating the fall of Sukarno.

According to official Indonesian history, the killings were the result

of a communist putsch.

Dr Roeslan claimed Sukarno had no foreknowledge of the coup. “He was

very naive though not with women. He was a politician, not a military

man. He thought he could make communism in Indonesia nationalistic and

this infuriated Russia and China”.

Although 14 years younger, Dr Roeslan was closely aligned with Sukarno

personally and politically, calling him ‘Indonesia’s George Washington’.

Despite this, Dr Roeslan survived the change of government and was sent

to New York by Suharto’s New Order government to negotiate Indonesia’s

re-entry into the United Nations.

He also grew to admire Suharto’s early reforms, but despised the later

excesses of the president’s family and friends: “He [Suharto] said there

could be no prosperity without security and stability — and in this he

was right”. Through his daughter’s biography Dr Roeslan is quoted as

describing Suharto as ‘a responsive and decent human being when free of

family greed’.

KLEPTOCRAZIES

Dr Roeslan retains an intellect nimble enough to dance around awkward

questions. So when asked about the qualities of current president

Megawati, daughter of his former colleague, he replied: “What is good,

what is bad?” Later his criticisms were hard but circumspect, preferring

the general to the specific.

“This present generation does not know what we fought for, and that is

the tragedy. There is so much waste. We are rich, but so many people

have been stealing from the nation — it is a sickness, like kleptomania.

We have become klepto-crazies. There are two and a half million

super-rich in Indonesia. They go to Singapore for their health and

shopping, not to their own country”.

Like most former politicians who have struggled with nation building, he

despises the indulgences of modern bureaucrats and their reluctance to

forego the plunder of power for the sake of the nation. He is also

miffed that his good relations with President Megawati have not led to

her following his advice on communicating more and spending less.

And for those less interested in moralising, Dr Roeslan has enough

personal anecdotes of the founding president to entertain kampong

gossips for a decade:

“He used to like to say there were two Sukarnos, but in reality there

were three. And I told him so. The first was the ideologist. He knew the

strength and weakness of the colonialists and our strengths and

weaknesses. That was good.

“The second was the politician, forming and using power, sometimes cooperating with the Japanese or the Islamists or the Nationalists. Then he would hit them. That was dangerous.

“The third was Sukarno as an individual. That was not so dangerous. He

used to say: ‘I can hate, I can love, I can be soft, I can be strong’.

“But you are making a mistake if you think his love was erotic. His love

was for beauty, in women, in the beach, in mountains and trees, in the

colours of the waves, the beauty of nature. He saw God in the smile of a

young girl, and in the suffering of people’”.

Apart from his status as a revolutionary hero who also survived a 1956

coup attempt, Dr Roeslan is a historian. His books include Seratus Hari

di Surabaya (One Hundred Days in Surabaya) a history of the 1945 battle

in the East Java capital in which he played a major role negotiating

with the invaders. The bloody clash was between nationalists and British

troops trying to liberate Allied prisoners of the Japanese and help

reinstall Dutch rule. /The Bandung Connection/ is an account of the 1955

Asia Africa Conference where 24 so-called non-aligned nations came

together in a bid to counter Western power. A collection of Dr Roeslan’s

essays was published in 1994 to commemorate his 80th birthday.

Dr Roeslan was born in a Surabayan kampong on 24 November 1914, the

son of a wealthy shopkeeper. Academically bright and an avid reader,

Roeslan married up into a priyayi (upper-class Javanese) family. He

was expelled from a teachers’ training college for political activities,

studied law, became an active nationalist and a skilled administrator.

PHAR LAP’S HEALTH

An infrequent visitor to Australia, he retains good impressions, though

corroded by recent events. Highlights include sitting alongside cab

drivers (‘I was flabbergasted!’), calling people by their forenames,

preserving the heart of a racehorse — these and other small incidents

are revived with glee. But not enough to mask his disquiet about

Australia’s perceived political shift in international alliances.

“I used to have great admiration for Australia because you are already

competing with Leiden (in Holland) in Indonesian studies”, he said.

“But this talk of pre-emptive strikes [against terrorists] is nonsense.

The lesson for Australia is not to look back to Europe and the United

States. Australia should not be a part of Europe — you should be part of

Southeast Asia.

“I should keep my mouth shut, but I tell you the most dangerous man is a

Javanese who is silent. So here’s one last message for Australia: Keep

preserving Phar Lap’s heart. I like that”.

##