For the last few months Australian lawyers and their fixers have been scouring remote villages in the eastern
islands of the world’s largest archipelago.
They’ve
been seeking young Indonesian
men illegally jailed in Australia’s adult prisons earlier this decade alongside
hardened criminals and sex offenders.
The men were sentenced for crewing people-smuggler boats. Yet they were children at the time and under
the law should have been repatriated.
Imagine
the outrage if Aussie kids had suffered the same fate in Indonesia. In 2011 the then Prime Minister Julia Gillard
got involved in the case of an Australian teen arrested in Bali on alleged drug charges.
The
boy was briefly detained
then repatriated after a
furious media campaign. This much larger and more
serious case got some coverage at the time, but has since slipped below the
horizon.
So far 123 young men have signed up to a class action for
compensation. Another ten to 20 could join if they can be traced. The
lawyers say they are waiting for a formal response from the Australian Human
Rights Commission (AHRC) . In turn it’s hanging out for comment from the
Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Commonwealth Director of Public
Prosecutions.
The illegal
jailings could have been
blamed on sloppy bureaucracy compounded by cultural ignorance. But political factors were also in
play. The Australian Government has been exercising tough laws to placate voters fearful
of a tsunami of asylum-seekers
from Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, Iraq and Iran transiting Indonesia, while at the same time cosying up
to then Indonesia President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, known as SBY.
If there’s no out-of-court settlement the claimants will head to the Australian Federal Court. If successful their win could cost Australian
taxpayers millions and make the victims rich.
So far, so good. But this tale is tangled.
There’s a dispute between Australian and Indonesian lawyers over
representation and jurisdictions.
If the victims
get nothing the bitterness could linger for years. Whatever the outcome Australia’s reputation as a
compassionate nation that honors international law and doesn’t put kids
in adult prisons has already
been shredded.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The story
started eight years ago. The
whistle-blower was Justice of the Peace (JP) Colin Singer.
The West
Australian doesn’t need to scratch his balding dome or flick through old
diaries to remember the date with precision.
It was 9 am
on 23 April 2010 and Singer was paying a routine visit to Western Australia’s
Hakea Prison in the Perth suburb of Canning Vale.
According to the Department of Justice the 1,225-bed jail ‘manages male prisoners who have been
remanded in custody while waiting to appear in court or those who have just
been sentenced’. So murderers, thugs, paedophiles and thieves checking in and out of
the legal terminal, queue together. Around 7,000 a year go in and out.
JPs like Singer are unpaid community-minded citizens
nominated by members of Parliament or magistrates. They witness signatures, approve police
search warrants and in remote areas sometimes sit in courts to hear minor
charges.
On
that Friday Singer was on duty for the Office of Custodial Services, an
independent statutory authority charged with monitoring jails and checking that inmates are treated
decently.
Hakea is for men, not
boys. Children, defined as those under
18, must be held apart from adults under the 1990 UN Convention on the Rights
of the Child. Australia is a signatory.
So is Indonesia.
In the jail Singer was approached by the medical director Dr
Brian Walker. “He told me: ‘there are kids in here’,” Singer told the Strategic Review. “I thought this impossible. I
had great faith in the Australian justice system and believed it to be fair.
“Then I saw them -
they were Indonesians, pre-pubescent
frightened children, certainly not men.”
The prisoners were
deckhands hired by people smugglers to illegally ferry asylum seekers fleeing
conflict zones and who had made it to Indonesia. They then sailed for Australia
on Indonesian fishing boats but had been caught by
the Australian Navy.
Singer is a
businessman who has worked in the oil and gas industry in Indonesia since 1989.
Originally from Scotland he’s an Australian citizen married to an Indonesian
and with homes in West Java and Perth.
Among the kids he
spoke to was Ali Yasmin (also known as Jasmin), from the basic settlement of
Balauring on the tiny island of Lembata east of Flores. “He was alone and
clinging to a fence, clearly traumatized,” Singer recalled.
Yasmin told Singer
that in December four Indonesian men and 55 Afghans were on the wooden craft
labelled by the Australian Navy as SIEV (Suspected Illegal Entry Vessel)
86. He said he’d been offered 15 million
rupiah (US$1,000)
to work as a cook.
To Australian
prosecutors that sum - equal to a year’s work or more - was proof the teen knew something wrong was afoot.
But Western reasoning doesn’t work in a tiny village more than 2,500
kilometres from cosmopolitan Jakarta.
If a stranger from
afar rocks in and offers big money for a small job why check the dentures of
this gift horse? Yasmin, who quit school at 12 to support his mother after his Dad
died, said he knew little of the outside world and nothing about people
smuggling.
He also said he was 13
and the youngest on board, but wasn’t believed because he had no
identification. Westerners abroad
carry
driving licences, credit cards and passports proving ID, but not hangabout
Indonesian kids taking one day at a time.
“I immediately contacted the
Department of Justice and the Indonesian Consul General in Perth,” said
Singer “I was naive. I thought this was an administrative error
that would be rapidly fixed. I was
wrong.”
Singer claimed 60
juveniles were in WA’s adult jails. The government said there were none
because Yasmin
and others had been confirmed as adults by the AFP using wrist X-rays. They
referenced a
1942 US bone atlas devised for Caucasians
and with a four-year plus-or-minus margin of error. On these grounds it was decided that Yasmin was 19.
Two years later the AHRC published An Age of Uncertainty, an inquiry
into ‘an inherently flawed technique’. It said the wrist test had already been
publicly ridiculed by leading specialists and professional medical societies as
‘unreliable and untrustworthy’.
But at the time voter
fear of boat people had become almost paranoiac; the AFP dismissed the doubters and recruited Perth radiologist
Dr Vincent Low to verify the procedure.
AHRC Commissioner Catherine Branson’s 313-page report found that ‘the
evidence is overwhelming that using skeletal age to assess chronological age is
an imprecise technique...
‘…the AFP, the Office of the
Commonwealth (Australian) Director of Public Prosecutions and the
Attorney-General’s Department engaged in acts and practices that led to contraventions
of fundamental rights; not just rights recognized under international human
rights law but in some cases rights also
recognized at common law,
such as the right to a fair trial.’
Although the document made no
reference to compensation, calls for redress came from Indonesian lawyer Lisa
Hiariej who has been working through Jakarta courts. More of her later.
Singer continued to
pursue the issue because “when you encounter a moral wrong you can’t let it
rest”. However he frustrated journalists
by refusing to have his name revealed, even demanding his voice be altered on TV
lest he be banned access to the prisoners.
The ploy fooled few for there were no stirrers so agitated and
identifiable as Singer with his strong Gaelic brogue.
Certainly the Australian government knew because Singer says he was called into the Australian
Embassy in
Jakarta; he said he was asked whether he was
associated with the Greens political party - a weird question to someone in the
mining industry.
Singer said he got the
impression that nothing would be done which might disturb relations with
Indonesia, then at a high following a successful address to the Australian Parliament by President SBY
Singer was also vice president of the Perth-based Non-Government Organization, the Indonesia Institute (II). President Ross Taylor alerted the media.
In 2013 TV journalist
Hamish Macdonald was the first Australian to visit Yasmin’s family in Balauring
where he saw school records. These
showed the lad had been born in 1996, though there were discrepancies over
dates.
The documents had been
faxed to the Indonesian Consul General in Perth but Yasmin’s defence lawyer
David McKenzie told Macdonald they were legally unverified so could not be
admitted as evidence.
The child was then
sentenced to the mandatory period of five years jail as a people smuggler under
a new Australian law which was supposed to scare
these villains into halting their noxious trade.
Human rights lawyers
object to mandatory sentences claiming these are often introduced as populist
measures, can lead to unfairness and miss their targets. In this case the law of unintended
consequences took over.
The people smuggler Big Guys safe in Jakarta had already got
their cash. Undeterred by Canberra’s
chest-thumping they continued selling high-price passages to Australia while
the beardless youngsters they recruited were doing time.
Why didn’t the court
view the scared lads in the dock not through an X-ray tube but the consciences
of Singer and the Hakea Prison staff who saw “pre-pubescent frightened
children”?
Proper legal
procedures may have been followed but the rules don’t include common sense. Why
didn’t the Indonesian government scream outrage and fan an international
crisis? And why weren’t there more
agitators? (The Greens have been prominent along
with some Labor Party politicians.)
Had the papers been presented
and accepted by the court, Yasmin would have
been whisked out of the country. Instead he was sent to prison in icy Albany,
WA’s most southerly town, latitude 35 degrees. His hometown Balauring is just below the equator.
Yasmin was put to work
in the prison laundry. Under demands
from the Australian Government, WA prison
regulations were changed to prevent the Indonesians sending their meagre
earnings back to their families. (State jails are used to house federal
prisoners.)
There was further petty
malice to show an anxious electorate that no way would government resolve slip
into solicitude. When some kids were
eventually repatriated they were dumped in Bali with no means of getting back
to their remote homes. Only after the
International Organisation for Migration got involved were escorts provided and
fares back to the villages.
Singer kept
pushing. In the early stages he was a
gruff and prickly personality who tended to headbutt issues and fire off clumsy
statements. In retrospect this may have been the right way because it made him
a compelling force not easily dismissed and a counterpoint to the tractable
Indonesian deckhands signing anything on an official’s clipboard.
II president Taylor described them as ‘generally the most liked,
respected and cooperative people to be ever apprehended in Australia’.
Singer’s approach put
him at odds with the more diplomatic Taylor,
so Singer quit the
NGO and
went public. He remains appalled at the kids’
plight but
now he’s more measured. “This experience has
changed me - and for the better,” he said. Taylor and Singer have
since reconciled.
The
doubts about age got too loud to ignore. Yasmin and 14 others were released ‘on
licence’ in 2012. Five years later the WA Court of
Criminal Appeal quashed Yasmin’s sentence.
The judges wrote they were ‘satisfied that a miscarriage of justice
… has occurred. If the appellant was aged under 18 years
when he allegedly committed the offence, the mandatory minimum penalty … for an
adult, did not apply to him.’
The
average time spent in detention by the Indonesian kids was 31.6 months. A wrong had eventually been recognised but
not righted. Despite all the current
legal busyness there’s no certainty the Indonesians will be recompensed for
their misery, fear and lost years.
The AHRC cannot order
compensation. It can only ask questions and try to conciliate. If the Government won't play ball then the lawyers can
ask a
court to order compensation.
This process can take years and decisions can
be appealed.
Canberra legal firm
Ken Cush and Associates says it is acting
pro-bono for the former detainees and taking a racial discrimination position.
Practice lawyer Sam Tierney said
there was no formula for compensation.
“We are comfortable that there are substantial grounds to show the
Commonwealth has racially discriminated against these children resulting in
their improper treatment and detention,” he said via e-mail.
“If the Commonwealth chooses not to compensate the children, we will litigate the cases and
ask the Federal Court to determine the cases and entitlements to damages.”
Sounds good, but the success
rate isn’t encouraging. The Australian Institute
of Criminology reports that 'most Australian jurisdictions are not generous,
nor are they transparent in awarding compensation ...most wrongfully convicted
people in Australia do not get any compensation'.
Ferdi
Tanoni, who lives in Kupang on the island of Timor in the Indonesian
archipelago, has been the go-to guy
for Australian supporters of the former prisoners living in the east end of
Indonesia.
He
also chairs an ‘advocacy
team’ fighting for
compensation through Australian courts for seaweed farmers allegedly affected
by the 2009 Montara wellhead oil spill off the WA coast.
“I
tell the boys that although the lawyers I’ve spoken to believe there’s a 70 per
cent chance of success, the
case could take a year or more,” he said.
“In the end they may not get anything. I tell them to keep praying.”
Back in Balauring Yasmin was alarmed to read the appeal decision was headed ‘Yasmin v The Queen’, and asked how he’d harmed the monarch. This took some explaining, as it would to many Australians. (‘The Queen’ is the legal term for the State.)
Back in Balauring Yasmin was alarmed to read the appeal decision was headed ‘Yasmin v The Queen’, and asked how he’d harmed the monarch. This took some explaining, as it would to many Australians. (‘The Queen’ is the legal term for the State.)
Yasmin
said he was optimistic that he’d eventually get some money. Now 22 he’s married and has a daughter. He speaks confidently on the phone in excellent
English that he learned in prison and said he bears no animosity - except towards the defence lawyers
who didn’t tell the court they had the papers confirming he was a child.
“Yasmin
is an Indonesian hero,” said Singer. “He
helped the others settle in. He calmed
things down in jail and acted as an interpreter. He’s had a horrendous time but his resilience
has been spectacular.
“In
all this I found most prison staff to be compassionate. My criticism is for the bureaucrats,
politicians and lawyers who turned away from their responsibilities and ignored
the rights of children.”
Meanwhile more snafus in
Indonesia. Last year Lisa Hiariej, the
lawyer who four years earlier had said she was seeking compensation, appeared
in the Jakarta District
Court claiming to represent Indonesian boys held in adult prisons in Australia between
2008 and 2012.
She
said
some of her clients had signed up with Ken Cush but they had returned to her after
she’d visited them in Kupang in February this year.
Speaking by phone from Jakarta she said: “I have the power of attorney for 115 boys
and I’ve been working on this for six years.
“This
is my case. These are uneducated people,
many don’t even speak Indonesian, (meaning they speak a regional language) and so they
just sign. I won’t go to the AHRC
and there’s no way I can work with the Ken Cush lawyers.
“I
am disappointed; this (the tussle over representation) is so sad. I’m only
doing this for the kids. I’m asking for one trillion rupiah (US$100 million)
to be split among the boys.
“It
has cost me about US$150,000.
I’ve financed everything by myself and with my family. There’s been no support from political
parties or religious groups, only backing by the KPAI.” (Komisi Perlindungan
Anak Indonesia - the Indonesian Child Protection Commission).
In March this year the Jakarta Court ruled against Hiariej’s
claim. “The case is now in the Pengadilan Tinggi (High Court ) for
appeal,” she said.
“If unsuccessful I may
refer the case to the
International Court of Justice.”
The Australian Government didn’t
attend the earlier Jakarta
hearing arguing that the court has no jurisdiction over Australian
matters.
“Ms
Hiariej has no role with our firm,” said Tierney. “Some of our clients were previously
represented by Ms Hiariej but have withdrawn those instructions and revoked any
authority that Lisa may have had to act on their behalf including in any
Indonesian Court proceedings.”
If the tortuous legal road looks likely to end in a
dead end, political lobbying to pay up and shut down the shame may be the
better recourse.
“Imagine
the outcry if an Australian child had been imprisoned in Indonesia,” Singer
said. “We’d have public outrage, ministerial involvement and condemnation of
the Indonesian judiciary.
“Yet
when it’s the other way around the majority have no interest at all. We think Australia is better than other
countries. It saddens me to say that we are not.”
The Fisher’s Story
I
saw my first Indonesian people smugglers in February 2012. They were X Riyan and X Hadi and they were
being led into the Perth District Courtroom 7.1 by uniformed security guards.
From
their curious titles it seemed they were protected informants given codenames;
the reality was more mundane but a telling example of cultural
differences. Many Indonesians have only
one name – a practice that Australian bureaucracy can’t accept. So both men were labelled X.
Riyan
was 28; Hadi’s age was unknown but the prosecution said he was an adult. We now
know he wasn’t and is on the list of
claimants.
Through an interpreter they pleaded ‘not guilty’ to the charge of unlawfully
transporting aliens into Australia.
Facing
them across the wide and almost empty court (an Indonesian diplomat
occasionally popped in as an observer) sat the jury of 12 Australian
citizens.
Also
confronting them as witnesses for the prosecution were several smartly dressed
and confident Afghan men who had sailed with the Indonesians and were now
living in the Australian community as legitimate refugees. They confirmed the prosecutor’s claims.
Hadi’s
statement said that in May 2010 he crewed a boat carrying coconuts to Flores. The job
done, he thought they were heading back to Batam,
a small Indonesian island near Singapore.
Instead
they went to Probolinggo on East Java’s north coast. Offshore and at night
the boat collected 54 Afghan men and
headed west, then south. On 3 June they were boarded by the Australian naval
patrol boat HMAS Maryborough.
Hadi
says he didn’t get paid and hadn’t negotiated a salary. Prosecutor Anthony
Eyers thought this incredible. Through an
interpreter Hadi replied that Indonesians don’t quibble and that he didn’t know
where the boat was going.
But, responded Eyers, inside the hull was water and food along with
lifejackets and mattresses. So why
didn’t Hadi protest when the Afghans clambered aboard, and demand to get off?
He
told the court he was seasick at the time.
The Head of Chancery at the WA Indonesian
Consulate-General office, Syahri Sakidin, said Hadi had tired of constant questions about his age. Speaking outside
the court he said: “In prison he gets good food, high quality medical care, and earns
AUD $30 (US$22) a week doing kitchen chores.
“The people smuggling mafia are using poor
fishermen …you have to understand the irony. It’s shameful they’re getting
money that way but you have to see it through their eyes.”
When
sentencing Riyan and Hadi to the mandatory five-year minimum (they have since
been deported), Judge Richard Keen said jailing the men would “bring home the
message” that Australia treats people smuggling seriously.
The
message settled well with Australian voters, less so among the estimated 14,000
mainly Middle-East asylum seekers still squatting in Indonesia
with little hope of making it to the Great
South Land.
The
boat people trade now appears to have sunk, but not the cargo of legal and moral wrongs. Recovery is taking years,and may never be
successful.
(First published in Strategic Review, 4 March 2019: https://sr.sgpp.ac.id/post/An-international-wrong
##
No comments:
Post a Comment