Calculating the cost
of giving
A hefty new motorbike van is just the transport needed for the
kids of Kalipare, a village between Malang and Java’s south coast. It can climb
hills and cope with the rugged roads even with a full load of giggling girls.
The St Yohanes elementary school has 54 students, but almost
a third live too far to walk. Few families
can afford their own motorbike. Reality
check: No free transport, no education.
Fortunately a generous person gave Rp 21 million [US$1,650] to
buy the machine, which is pleasing news for the school. There are no company
logos, so no commitments to commerce.
However the gift didn’t come with money for fuel,
maintenance and salary for driver Yulius Katijan . Consequently these expenses have been lifted
from the general school budget. This
means the ‘library’ (right) will remain a junk room until another donor appears to pay
for stock and refurbishing.
These are the sort of issues that poor schools in Indonesia
have to juggle when government cash is not enough. They are also encountered daily by Father
Bonifasius Hudiono, 53, who heads the Karmel Foundation in East Java.
Karmel supports 7,000 students in 61 village schools and 60
kids in an orphanage. Some money comes
from the Indonesian government, though Father Bonifasius alleged that local
officials cut 20 per cent off the grants.
He committed himself as a man of God after completing
theological studies 25 years ago. Although he insists that thumbing a
calculator hasn’t replaced his commitment to the cross, his days are spent
wondering when the next rupiah will arrive.
“Deus providebit” [God will provide], he said, and to test his faith
checked Karmel’s bank balance on his smart phone. Lo and behold, Rp 10 million
[US$770] had just been deposited.
Didn’t he want to know the source? He knows the person, but not how they got
their cash. So if it was from trading
stocks in companies that make cigarettes, alcohol or weapons would he accept?
“These are ethical questions that we haven’t started to
think about in Indonesia,” he said. “I have taken money from a tobacco
company’s education foundation, but thought that to be OK because it wasn’t directly
associated with smoking. We won’t promote the company’s products.”
Taking a principled stand on moral issues is easier in
countries where governments fund compulsory education and no-one is denied schooling
for want of money. But in Indonesia
there’s little space to debate such niceties when the needs are raw and urgent.
Only three pupils at St Yohanes are Muslim, according to
principal Wuryanto. But down the road at St Antonius junior high school the
majority are Muslim.
“We are not seeking
to Christianise students – that’s a lie,” said Father Bonifasius. (below) “We are trying
to provide high quality education and care so children in isolated areas get a
chance to succeed. Parents who appreciate what we’re doing will eventually make
the schools self sufficient.
“Attracting business donations is becoming difficult as the
government gets more efficient in taxing companies, which are now less
interested in Corporate Social Responsibility [CSR]. [See breakout]
“We’ve had money from Europe and Japan but these donations
tend to be for one-off projects.
“People give for a variety of reasons. Maybe a few think they are buying a ticket to
heaven. But most are genuine, giving
thanks for the church’s help or because they’d like to share their
blessings. We want people to give with a
good heart.
“I don’t sell poverty.
When people ask what they can do to help the poor I just direct them to
a specific need at a school.”
Endang Haryani (above) doesn’t get to follow her training as an
engineer. Instead, like Father
Bonifasius, she spends her time hunting rupiah for Malang’s non-denominational Foundation
for Educating the Handicapped [YPAC], supporting and training about 140 young
people.
She’s also had to look overseas. Recently she got a direct
donation from the New Zealand Embassy and a rehabilitation charity in NZ to
upgrade facilities at the school.
“We’ve been operating for 60 years and the government allows
us use of the building,” she said. “We need Rp 1.5 billion [US$ 115,000] a year
for running costs – we get Rp 45 million [US$3,500] from the government.
“The rest comes from donors.
Although we’ve put up many proposals for CSR funding we’ve had only one
response – from a bank. Not all donors want to be involved with the
handicapped. It’s definitely getting
harder to raise money.”
Need for reform
The Corporate Social Responsibility system, where companies
pay for community services, can be thinly disguised advertising. Users of a small recreation park in Malang
promoting good health are left in no doubt that a tobacco company has funded
the equipment.
In 2012 the national government enacted a 2007 law requiring
companies that manage or use natural resources to bear a social and
environmental responsibility. The
original legislation applied to all corporates, but strong objections from
business whittled application down to extractive industries.
Dr Dwi Budi Santoso ( right), vice director of Brawijaya University’s
Development Economics and Society Study Center agreed that the CSR system was
unfair because it depended on a company’s location, size and interests, and the
skills and contacts of fundraisers.
“I was an advisor to a local government in East Java in its
negotiations with a gold mining company,” he said. “We wanted CSR to be built
into the agreement but the company refused because it would have diluted
profit. So the permit was refused.
“Companies can play favorites with CSR, and it’s difficult
to enforce. There’s not much trust between government and business and there’s
a lack of accurate data. The whole tax system in Indonesia needs to be reformed
to make sure the disadvantaged who need funds get State support wherever they
are.”
(First published in The Jakarta Post 22 March 2015)
No comments:
Post a Comment