Dodgy data bad for
your public health
There are lies, damned
lies and statistics. Numerous claimants to coinage. Possibly Benjamin Disraeli.
As a trainstopper the intro to an ABC Health and Wellbeing programme last month [aug] couldn’t have been
more shocking:
‘About
one in two Australians will be diagnosed with cancer. That means if you don't
get it, the person sitting next to you will.’
Later promotions sandwiched ‘during their lifetime’ between the
sentences, though it seemed superfluous.
Will
– or may? How could this be? Fifty per cent of the population? That’s 12 million people. Surgeries and
hospitals would crash.
Cancer
is an important issue that demands attention – which it received in the story
of a fit young man who cared for his health yet still contracted bowel cancer -
but had the ABC got the figures wrong?
Like
most Australians I’ve lost friends and relatives to the disease and know others
in treatment. But that’s a small minority
of my acquaintances.
Denise Musto from Audience and Consumer Affairs took a fortnight to reply that the
unit was ‘satisfied that the story
kept with the ABC’s editorial standards for accuracy’ adding:
‘… the
statistic was taken from the Cancer Australia website which states: ‘In
2016, it is estimated that the risk of an individual being diagnosed with
cancer by their 85th birthday will be 1 in 2.’
Then it added a rider: ‘1 in 2 males and 1 in 3 females’.
So the ground
had shifted. The birthday clause was not in the original promotion nor was the gender
difference. But the data was still
frightening.
Cancer
Australia’s Dr Nerissa Soh said
the national government agency got its statistics from on-line books published
by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.
“In the All Cancers on their Incidence page, there
are numbers for the risk of being diagnosed with cancer before the age of 85,”
she said. “In 2012 this was 1 in 2 and this risk has been the same since 1987.”
Is risk
certainty? Not in my understanding of
language.
Mark Short, Manager
of the Australian Cancer Database at the AIHW confirmed his
organisation was the source of the figures, but added:
“However,
there are some important ‘ifs and buts’ that go along with it which perhaps the
ABC programme did not explain. I’m only going to explain the main one to you
because the others would be getting into too much nitty-gritty detail.
“Risk of
being diagnosed with cancer by age 85 (1 in 2) does NOT (his emphasis) equate to proportion of
people 85 and over who have had a diagnosis of cancer. If that were so, as
you point out, half of all people 85+ would have had a diagnosis
of cancer (before reaching 85), which is clearly not true.
“What the
risk figure is saying is, based on the cancer incidence rate
statistics we have right now and assuming that they remain the same into the
future, a baby born today has about a 1 in 2 chance of being diagnosed
with cancer before they turn 85.
“If that
person gets cancer they have a fair chance of dying from it before
they turn 85 in which case they disappear from the population (or, just to make
matters more complicated, they might never be diagnosed
with cancer but still die before turning 85).
“So the
people who make it to age 85 are not representative of all the people born 85 years ago; they are the
lucky ones, at least as far as longevity goes.
“If you
imagine that everyone who dies remains in the population as a zombie (a
non-hostile one!), then perhaps about 1 in 2 members of this ‘alive + zombie’
population will have been diagnosed with cancer before turning 85.
“I say
‘perhaps’ because, as mentioned in the first paragraph, there are other ifs and
buts that go with the mathematical formula that calculates the risk; the risk
figure should be taken as approximate rather than exact.”
From all this
hedging it’s clear that the ABC’s original statement is at best open to
misinterpretation and most certainly depressingly alarmist.
The
Australian Bureau of Statistics publishes clearer figures gleaned from the
census: ‘In 2011-12 there were
326,600 persons who had cancer, or around 1.5 per cent of the Australian
population. This reflects little change from 2007-08.’
The real
concern that should have drawn the ABC’s attention is this: Despite all the
advances in preventative measures, sophisticated treatments, social awareness
programmes, massive expenditure and intensive world-wide research the risk of
getting cancer has remained the same for the past 29 years. Why?
Whatever
that risk it certainly doesn’t mean that ‘if you don't get it, the person
sitting next to you will.' Unless that
person is an octogenarian statistics juggler.
Or a zombie.
(First published in On Line Opinion 14 September 2016: See:
http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/view.asp?article=18518&page=0
##
.
No comments:
Post a Comment