Secrets of the kampong
The kampong
is the place foreigners seldom go without good reason and a local guide, though
not because of violence.
The dark
and pokey lanes, houses leaning into, over and against each other, the
claustrophobia all combine to make those who value space feel unwelcome.
To ignorant
Westerners, kampongs seem to be the imagined dens of Eastern vice. For others,
who only glimpse them in passing, the statue-flanked gateways celebrating
freedom fighters and Pancasila pledges hint of robust communities deep within,
united by nationalism and a shared history.
What
happens beyond is a mystery for many, though not for Robbie Peters who spent a
year in Dinoyo, a kampong of 10,000 on the flank of Surabaya’s ironically named
Kali Mas (Gold River). Maybe it
glittered once; now it’s better known as Kali Coca Cola.
The
Australian academic picked an ideal time to start his research as major social
change erupted across the nation.
Fine for
him, not the locals. The rupiah dived, prices rocketed. Jobs vanished, and when they resurfaced they
were different.
Fortress
Soeharto was breached. There was violence in the streets. For a while it seemed that no one could hold
the country together. The new word was krismon, short for krisis
moneter, no translation needed.
But
Indonesia didn’t break down like Egypt or crash like Syria. The gears grated, the engine coughed, but
democracy kept edging forward and stayed on the road – a modern miracle of
social change insufficiently acknowledged.
The
streetscape scars remain. The defining
image of the Republic’s second largest city has been the rusting skeletons of
high-rise developments where work abruptly halted when the banks went bust.
Now new
glitzy hotels and air-conditioned malls are opening, giving short-term visitors
the confidence to report modernity and prosperity despite the smog and traffic
chaos.
The
observers might be at ease with spreadsheets but know nothing about the
claustrophobic kampongs where ordinary folk live and toil in their sprawling
‘informal industrial estates.’
Dr Peters
does and it’s a pity that his Surabaya, 1945-2010 has such a bland
title and
confusing cover, because this is more than a dissertation spruced up to earn a
place on shop shelves.
Although the
author has produced a useful book that goes beyond its narrow title to provide
a broader picture of the nation’s development, there are flaws.
Many
monochrome photos are so bland they hardly justify inclusion. The in-text references annoy because they
work like speed bumps. Even the most banal quote has been attributed. Right for
a thesis, wrong for a book.
This isn’t
just about Dinoyo; the micro is the macro. Through the kampong we see the
nation. Developers crash, the powerless are crippled, then crushed again.
Markets burn, malls rise. The military
triumphs, the masses are cowed – but just for a while.
The outside
view is of an industrious and pious society.
That’s true, but the inside story includes corrupt administrators,
exploiters, gamblers, prostitutes, drug-takers and the seriously slimy. Then there’s the poor – around 40 per cent
during krismon.
Surabaya is
a great place for adventure, but a tough town to love. It’s rough, messy, wretchedly hot, flat and
featureless. From the air the saw-tooth
roofs of factories spread to the horizon.
At ground level the choked roads are so bereft of landmarks it’s easy to
get lost.
Decay
squats alongside development, much of it crass. But behind the fences of
graffiti and rust are frangipani-shaded graveyards and mosques where ancient
beliefs thrive.
On the
adjacent boulevards the solid homes of the former colonialists now house top
bureaucrats and business people who believe they run the city.
Surabaya
has a heart and it beats in places like Dinoyo where Javanese and Madurese live
so closely there’s no space left for the intolerant. Proximity has created character and togetherness has molded
society.
In rows of
houses with no backyards and windows opening straight into alleyways you can
touch the wall opposite. One person’s dirty washing is everyone’s business.
Through Dr
Peters’ observations, trawling of papers past and profiles of people like
Rukun, the one-time guerrilla fighter in the war against the Dutch, we get
insights into the lives of the wong kecil (ordinary folk) that continue
to shape modern Indonesia.
Rukun
became a factory worker then a suspect communist during the 1965 post coup
d’etat and went on the run.
Betrayed by
other residents he was tortured and ‘electrocuted’, an editing error that
should have been picked up by this scholarly publisher, for Rukun survived his
ordeal to become a source for much history.
A key
informant for Dr Peters was town planner Johan Silas who has been a major
influence in cleaning up Surabaya, popular for advocating preservation of
kampongs when the military administrators wanted demolition.
The men in
uniforms sought control yet remained fearful of the masses that could easily
over-run authority should their anger be aroused or despair become intolerable.
Dinoyo’s
latest shift is to a suburb of boarding houses for workers in nearby
industries. Incompetent governments
continue to seek the upper hand. Now toll road development threatens.
Will the
kampongs survive? They’ll evolve and have already started to go vertical. Indonesians, with their splendid quality of
stoic resistance need people and see safety in numbers. That’s something few Westerners understand –
unless they read this book.
Surabaya,
1945 – 2010 by Robbie
Peters
NUS Press
Singapore 2013
(Review first published in The Jakarta Post 10 February 2014)
1 comment:
C'mon, Duncan. Surabaya's a bit rough but I'd rather live here than in Jakarta.
I'll look forward to seeing the book.
Post a Comment